Not everyone submits a log especially that the RaDAR challenge is really a challenge against yourself but also good to compare other’s results to see if you’re doing OK or not.
Being international and having to choose a four hour period within a twenty four hour period, we don’t have the same proximities or propagation conditions so “apples with apples” could never be compared.
Usually QRP power levels are more difficult to use but power output categories are not defined as it balances itself out as a weight issue if you need to carry the kit. Usually around 20 Watts is a good average for reasonable success.
I received a log from Thomas, DG1PY. Firstly I was very impressed to see Germany taking part. Thomas’s log was also very well presented.
Thomas made three transitions which I think is a good average. What’s interesting here too is that only the first five QSO’s can count but the sixth one is considered gentlemanly. So for this deployment the score would be 15. Thomas mentioned there was a contest on the go and that sometimes makes it difficult for RaDAR to RaDAR contacts in order to achieve bonus points.
All three deployments in Thomas’s case had similar results which gives him a total score of 45 which is really pretty good! There you have it, how did you compare? Thomas may try transitions on a bicycle during the next challenge which will also be an interesting challenge. It’s also great to mix various transition methods.
Some take on the challenge as a group and some take it on alone. To be quite honest, I prefer to do it alone, not that I’m not a team player but the challenge is to have a well focused team and that’s a challenge in itself!
We will see the next challenge in April……
73 de Eddie ZS6BNE